Monday, 27 March 2017

Commissions | Locations Workshop at Historic Dockyard Chatham (27th March 2017)

Today we visited the Historic Dockyard in Chatham, which is somewhere that has catered for a number of productions, such as Les Misérables (2012), SS-GB (2017) and more.

The aim of the visit was to go to a section of the dockyard and film a sequence, so that we could practice filming on location, and somewhere we may not necessarily know a great deal about.  We also needed to consider:
  • Risk Assessments - looking for any risks and hazards that could arise from filming in our location and accommodating for them.
  • Permissions - seeing what and who we could actually film and asking for permission to film certain areas and people.
Once we had been given a tour of the dockyard, each group was assigned a different part of the attraction to film.  We were given the ropery, and so we went there and carried out a risk assessment so we could ensure our filming was as safe as possible.


We looked over the footage that everybody had shot later on, and found a number of issues with the footage we had shot.  We found that we had not shot enough establishing shots, and we had broken the 180° rule several times.  Despite this, we learnt that it is important to consider, not only the potential risks of shooting on location, but also that it is vital to get enough coverage during a shoot, otherwise meaning and purpose can be lost.

Part of our filming also involved a demonstration by the ropemakers, which was a very quick process, meaning a lot of our footage was very shaky and disorganised as we did not really know what was going on.  Therefore we also learnt that it is important to check with your contributors that you both understand what is being filmed and the considerations for how you are going to film it.

Here is an edit of the footage that Jason and I put together:



Thursday, 23 March 2017

Commissions | Contextual Research: Louis Theroux


Dubbed as the "king of documentaries" by Kasia Delgado of Radio Times, Louis Theroux stands as one of the most recognisable and distinct documentary filmmakers of the last 20 years.  I wanted to research into Theroux, not only as he is my favourite documentary filmmaker, but also because of the idea that I would be presenting our documentary and I wanted to see what it takes to present a documentary as effectively as Louis Theroux.

From watching Louis' documentaries for BBC Two, I have noticed a very distinct factor of his presenting style - the story we follow throughout always focuses on his journey to find out the truth, as opposed to merely telling us what the truth is.  His documentaries will follow him travelling from place to place to talk to different people; they are very much documentaries about Louis finding out a topic rather than just about the topic.

Whilst Louis is very much the central focus of his documentaries, he never speaks directly to the camera, only through voiceover, in interviews with the subjects of his documentaries and on some occasions to his director which gives his documentaries a sense of self-awareness.  I feel this is what makes his documentaries so fun and watchable, as we feel as though we are a part of the production process, as if we are standing there with Louis.  There is an exception to this in his documentary 'Savile', in which he speaks toward us, but does not directly into the camera.  This is because he was reflecting on how he conducted himself in the original 'When Louis Met...' episode on Jimmy Savile.  This was done to highlight himself as a subject, as Savile manipulated him through how he presented himself in their time together, and so he is essentially providing his own personal views.
In our documentary, I feel we could learn a lot from Louis' style to present the narrative and since I will be presenting the documentary, Louis' style is certainly one to take note from.  The subject matter of our documentary does not necessarily just rely on the interview subjects, as Louis' documentaries do, and therefore I feel we would be able to shoot pieces with me presenting to the camera.  This will allow me to add more background information and statistics directly to the audience.


We will certainly make use of commentary in our documentary to provide insight on top of what we can see, much like Louis does in his documentaries.

I think that the most important aspect of Louis' documentaries is his warm and likeable personality combined with his ability to ask hard-hitting questions.  This is something I will need to work on: making myself, at least appear likeable on screen.

Bibliography:
http://www.radiotimes.com/news/2016-06-18/what-is-it-about-louis-theroux

Wednesday, 22 March 2017

Commissions | Pitching Our Idea

Since our initial meetings with Zoe, we have developed a pitch document and presentation for our documentary, as seen here:





After presenting to Zoe and Helen, they gave us some useful feedback to help us move forward before we went into production.  The overall sense from them was that we had to be very careful with the tone of the documentary, or else it would seem that we were whining about something that does not affect us in a major way.  Therefore we needed to take a more sensitive approach to the subject of money for people that need to drive but cannot afford it.

Thursday, 16 March 2017

Commissions I Interview + Sound Workshop (15th March 2017)


Today we were asked to prepare some questions to experiment with how to shoot interviews, particularly focusing on the lighting, framing and sound.  We prepared some questions to ask a subject (Katie) so that we could practise with these interviewing techniques.

Before we got to work, we looked at some tutorials and tips on how and why we film interviews.  Interviews add personal experience and expertise to a film, adding evidence and emotional engagement to the subject matter you are exploring.  It is important that the questions we ask are open and encourage self-contained answers to enable their input to feel natural and relevant.


Lighting is also very important in interviews.  We played around with a standard three-point lighting setup to see what brought out the best in the subject.  Mis en scéne is another key factor of interviewing.  The location and objects in the background can show a lot about a subject to give more context into the topic of the interview and the person being interviewed.

For our main documentary idea, we were thinking of focusing on driving, therefore we could interview somebody in a car.  For this, we would need to consider lighting and audio especially to compensate for the lack of room, engine noises and of course, the safety of the driver and passenger.

*NOTE* We were unable to access the footage from the camera, and so, unfortunately, our interview was lost.


Image credit: https://mediastorm.com/blog/2013/04/17/standard-three-camera-interview-setup/

Monday, 13 March 2017

Commissions | Testing Ideas with Zoe Sale

In the weeks leading up to our pitch, both myself and my group (Katie, Jason and Sonia) have been brainstorming potential ideas for our documentary.  We had a session with Zoe Sale, who works as a Development Producer for the BBC - this involves thinking up ideas for programs, pitching programmes, and commissioning them to be put out for broadcast.  One example of a show she pitched for is 'Are Our Kids Tough Enough? Chinese School?' which I watched when it was first broadcast.



With Zoe, we discussed how producers typically come up with ideas for documentaries, and how these ideas translate onto the screen.  There are a number of ways in which ideas for shows can come about, and Zoe discussed some of the most common and effective bases that producers find inspiration for documentary topics:

  • 'Whatever happened to [...]?"
  • Anniversaries of an event / death / birth
  • Sheer curiosity
  • News stories
  • Current media: what topics are selling well or are popular?
  • Ordinary people placed in extraordinary circumstances
  • Locations: generating ideas through interesting places to film and document
  • A good title or a well-worn format
The most important aspect of any of these ways of finding ideas was to decipher what the big question of the documentary should be: what is the hook?  Audiences need to want to commit their time to watching a documentary and so the hook should be enough to entice them to start watching.  During the process of choosing an idea for a documentary, it is also vital that we ensure we have strong narrative and central characters, and a universal/relatable theme - so that is has an effect on your mind, heart, or wallet.

We went on to discuss our ideas, baring in mind that we were still in the early stages of development.  I mentioned my initial idea which would involve documenting a day at the special needs school that my mother works at.  As of yet, I am unsure where I could take this idea - I had thought of perhaps shooting the documentary as a 'day-in-the-life' sort of style, following a teenager with learning difficulties and finding out the troubles faced by these young people in a society that may not be tailored to their needs.

With Zoe, we discussed things to consider if my group were to roll with this idea, including:

  • Getting permissions from parents - since we would be filming in a school, this could cause us a lot of hassle before the camera starts rolling.
  • We should focus on some sort of journey, as opposed to just following someone around and waiting for something to happen.
  • With this subject in particular, we must also be careful not to turn it into a sob story which would end up being a cheap attempt at enhancing emotion by focusing on a more vulnerable subject.
I was good to hear other peoples' documentary ideas and gauge where they were in terms of development so that I could gain a better idea of what shape our documentary would be taking.

After the session, myself and my group discussed our potential ideas, and came up with another plausible topic to focus on for our documentary.  Since all four of us had passed our driving tests over the last two years, the process of learning to drive, passing our tests and buying cars was all very fresh in our minds.  Driving is almost a rite of passage for young people and was a very important thing for us, and so we decided to look into teen drivers and the difficulties preventing that may be facing them and how important it can be for young people to drive.  I researched some statistics on driving and found that teenagers made up for 43% of new drivers, and that over the last decade, the number of people taking their driving test has declined by about 25%.

Zoe seemed to like the idea but stressed that we need to focus on exactly what our angle was, rather than on teenage drivers in general, otherwise we risk making the documentary seem disjointed and confused.  We had also agreed that we would film the documentary using a presenter to literally drive around to different locations and interview people and visit different places etc.  We decided that I would be the best person to do this as I was the most passionate about driving and could discuss the topic at length, however Zoe also pointed out that whilst I can do this, I may not necessarily be the most interesting presenter, as I did not represent any kind of struggle that would relate to a BBC Three audience.

Zoe also gave us a really great idea to bring a sort of challenge element to the documentary to add a sense of tension and edge.  She suggested that we could focus on one person who relies on driving and seeing how they cope when their car is taken away and they must rely on other means of transport to get around.  We thought this would be an interesting and fun thing to film which would also work as our hook to hone in on the entertainment side of the documentary, which we had been struggling with.

All in all, the feedback from Zoe was very beneficial and moved us on the right direction to prepare us for our pitch.

Friday, 10 March 2017

Commissions | Research, Storytelling, Ethics and Representation (10th March 2017)

We began today's session with a brief discussion about issues we had during the production process of the previous unit to see how we could avoid these issues when making our documentaries.

I had several issues with my last shoot, the most significant problem I came by was due to health and safety.  This involved gaining permission to use a location for shooting a scene that needed a match to be struck by the central character.  Though this seems so trivial, if anything were to go wrong - such as the fire alarm being triggered - this would have caused a lot of disruption to the production process and to the people around the location we were filming.  I got around this problem by changing some of the script so instead of a match being lit, the character would find and use a mobile phone to illuminate the way.  I didn't actually end up shooting this scene, so it was little matter whether I changed it or not; even so, this was a vital learning curve which showed me that it is very important to prepare to change your shoot to accommodate for any potential risks, hazards and complications that can arise due to what was permissible on location.


Some other points for discussion that may translate into this project were:

  • Casting:  In documentaries, people are personally involved with the subject matter and so you must be sensitive and aware that they are not gaining anything from being incorporated in your film.  Whereas in a drama, your contributors will be gaining something from being in the production.
  • Planning:  Always have a backup plan - similarly with my health and safety issue, it s important to have a 'plan B' in case you are unable to shoot anything.
    • Timing is also incredibly important to ensure that everything is filmed efficiently.
    • With documentaries especially, you must not commit to a plan before asking whether or not something is possible.  For example, planning an interview with somebody that may not be available on a particular day.
  • You should meet your talent/contributors before you shoot rather than just commuting via email as this will allow you to grasp a sense of what they are like and how they will react to being on film.
We then discussed what sort of things we need to research and prepare for in the build up to our shoot:
  • Test the credibility of your story so that you can begin to develop the script, rough schedule and budget.
    • It is essential to understand the potential of your idea and what the audience will see.
  • Research relevant online sites, journals and publications to grasp a better understanding of the wider topic and background to the story you are going to tell.
  • Establish your key contacts
    • Look after them, make them feel important and keep them up-to-date and informed throughout the entire production process.
    • Don't make contact with anyone without first knowing and understanding the bigger picture.
    • Prepare some basic questions to ask your contacts:
      • Name / Age / Contact details / Availability / Potential locations / Potential sequences / Parental consent if necessary / Relevant permissions regarding the vulnerability of the contributor
  • Familiarise yourself with any relevant information before even considering shooting the film:
    • Any relevant legislation and regulations that relate to the subject matter you are covering.
    • Are there any organisations or experts that could provide an insight into the topic?
    • Existing research:  up-to-date and if possible, unpublished - this will give the information we present an extra edge and sense of exclusivity.
    • Look into any relevant case studies and any previous TV or archive coverage.
      • Try to find people who best illustrate the story you are trying to tell, and people who are good at conveying this story through their speech.
  • Factual films require a 'journalist's nose':
    • What is your angle? / What is new and makes your film worth commissioning? / What is your unique selling point?
When filming a documentary, you must bare in mind ethics and representation to ensure that what you are filming provides a sensitive and fair portrayal of the subject matter and those involved in the film.  

Representation typically refers to issues relating to:
  • Disability
  • Income / Class
  • Values / Culture
  • Ethnicity/ Race
  • Religion
  • Sexuality / Gender
  • Issues, e.g. Crime
  • Tokenism
  • Youth, Middle and Old Age
There are a number of different organisations that deal with issues of representation in the media to ensure that people are treated fairly and represented honestly; to avoid stereotyping and enforcing prejudices:
  • OFCOM
  • Press Complaints Commission
  • Pressure Groups
  • Broadcasters will also have their own guidelines
When we produce our documentaries, it is very important that we should deal with representation fairly, and to treat everybody involved with respect.  They do not have to be involved, so doing this will ensure they stay on board and you do not lose credibility as a documentary filmmaker.  You are the driving force of the film in a directorial and editorial sense, but be mindful of who else has a vested interest in your film - contributors, producers, sponsors etc.

When shooting for locations, we should consider:
  • Aesthetics
  • Practicalities
  • Relevance
  • Permissions / Access
  • Shot and Story-telling Possibilities
  • Finances
  • Any Filming Opportunities / Events
As we look into the people we want to use for our case studies, we must meet them in person in a safe environment.  We should be prepared by bringing our I.D. contact details, any key questions we need to ask them, and we should take notes on them as well.  Consent forms should be signed before filming takes place so to avoid any complications from what may arise during the interview.  On a similar note, you should only gain permission for 'major' contributors, so people that are involved on a speaking capacity with any significant screen time.  As a courtesy, we should also place signs around the filming location to inform people that there is filming taking place.

It is vital that we keep contributors informed and willing to participate in filming, so we should be willing to negotiate - but do not make promises that cannot be kept.  Approaching with "is this a good time to talk?", "are you free?", or "when would you be free to talk?" is ideal as our contributors will not be expecting a call to participate in a documentary - start by telling people that you are reaching out to them for research purposes.

Maintain good record-keeping, behave as you would with a potential employer and remain impartial so to build a good rapport.  Most importantly, you must remember to be professional: friendly, but not friends.  We watched and discussed Louis Theroux's documentary in which he revisited his original film on Jimmy Saville, prior to Operation Yewtree and the revelations about his paedophilia and sexual assaults, and we considered how important it is to not become too friendly with your contributors in the most extreme example.

Louis reflected on his approach to documenting the life of Jimmy Savile in When Louis Met Jimmy, particularly how Savile became to engrossed in the documentary and how close they became during the process.  As a result of this friendly relationship developing, it can be argued that Louis lost some of the credibility and impartiality of the documentary, as he had a more positive bias toward someone that was hiding his true motives and effectively putting on a show for the camera.

As I mentioned, this is a very extreme example of how professionalism and impartiality is important to highlight the credibility of a documentary piece, but it does go to show how people can manipulate a seemingly factual output to hide true intent.  When it comes to making our own documentaries, it is important to come across as friendly but to remain professional and impartial.

Wednesday, 8 March 2017

Commissions | Factual Programming and the Documentary Genre (8th March 2017)

Today we had a more in-depth look at the conventions of the documentary as a genre and factual programming in general.  'Factual programming', in general, is any non-fiction programme: each variant of this has its own conventions, habits and clichés.

Truth and Controversy

In 2007, the BBC's reputation was damaged after revelations of 'fakery' surfaced - competitions in particular, such as on Blue Peter and Radio 1 had been faked which led to the BBC being fined £400,000 by Ofcom.  In 2016, 'Human Planet' was also revealed to have used staged footage of seemingly real scenarios in nature, which caused a great amount of controversy.  This brought further attention toward how much intervention is acceptable in documentaries.

There are rough degrees of 'accepted intervention' for television programmes:




We looked at a documentary (Hidden Kingdoms, BBC) which involved a lot of intervention but this did not deceive the audience in any way; it added to the story-telling element of the documentary [see clip].  It was interesting to see how the director has chosen to display reality in such a clearly staged and forced way that it adds drama and makes a factual documentary appear much more interesting and engaging.


Factual Genres
There are a number of differing factual genres which all serve different purposes depending on their subject matter:

  • Current Affairs (such as BBC's Panorama and Channel 4's Dispatches)
    • Reporter-led; less observational and more constructed; important for freedom of speech
    • Investigative, consumer, political, health, social affairs, crime, business and finance.
  • News
  • Documentaries
    • To inform, but also to entertain and engage us.
    • 'Artistic representation of reality' (R. Flaherty quoted in Aufderheide, P. 2003, p.7)
    • Documentary filmmakers often act as representatives of the public.
    • Voyeurism: are these films 'in the public interest'?
    • Documentaries provide a particular viewpoint, interpretation, or understanding of the evidence which they put before us
    • Sub-genres and hybrids
      • Poetic, expository, educational, observational, relective, participatory, performative
    • Hybrid and evolving forms
      • Drama-doc, docu-soap, reality TV, factual entertainment, structured/scripted reality, multi-cam observational
  • Reality TV
  • Factual Entertainment (such as ITV's The X Factor)
Conventions of Factual Programming
  • Style
  • Structure
  • Varied Formats - e.g. studio discussion panel
  • Shots - e.g. handheld cameras used for realism
  • Commentary - allows for views to be imposed alongisde the visuals
  • Narration
  • Music - dependent on tone
  • Experts - used to add intelectual weight to a piece
  • Subject of Satire
Factual devices - for example, engineering tension through careful casting which allows for 'light and shade' to emerge

Funding and Truth
How and by whom factual films receive their budget has an important impact on style, content and their viewpoint.  The input of sponsorship and advertising, as well as pay-per-view channels can all have an influence on these things.  It is vital that this programming is impartial.

Purpose of factual programming:
  • Revelation
  • Entertainment
  • Story-telling
  • Style and content
We ended the session by watching and discussing Dreams of a Life by Carol Morley, which is a documentary that focuses on the life and mystery surrounding the death of Joyce Vincent who was found dead in her bedsit several years after her death.  Morley was inspired by news reports and sought to track down witnesses and people that knew Joyce so she could piece together an account of her life and deduce what could have happened to her.

We discussed the narrative structure of the film:
  • Dramatisation:  the documentary relies heavily on the dramatic reconstructions of the events that took place in Joyce's life which allowed Morley to explore her as a character and the police investigation into her death.
  • Motifs:  we see the taxi with the advert pleading for information about Joyce, which alludes to her character - "have you seen Joyce Vincent?" - was Joyce lost within herself as well as literally lost?
  • Interviews and testimony:  the story is told through the interviews with Joyce's friends and colleagues as opposed to through commentary or a presenter which allows for the raw and human emotive side of the film to come through.
  • Timeline:  we started at the end of the story which allows for the sense of mystery to emerge from the very start of the film.

We also discussed the challenges that Morley likely faced when producing the film:
  • Investigative journalism:  Since there was very little evidence of how Joyce died, Morley would have had to carry out extensive research into her life and had to track down anybody and everybody that knew Joyce when she was alive.
  • Monetary:  The film relies on extensive reconstructions using actors and sets, so she would have required a large budget in order to achieve this.
  • Permissions:  The film tackles some sensitive and personal details of Joyce's life, and so Morley needed to ensure that the people related to and involved with Joyce were happy for this information to be shared.
    • Subjudice/public domain: it is illegal for films to be released before a police case has closed, but since the case had closed with an open verdict, this was not an issue.
I had seen Dreams of a Life before and viewing it a second time around enforced the confusion and mystery surrounding Joyce Vincent's death.  I feel that Morley tackled the subject very well as she seemed to bring Joyce back to life in a way through the juxtaposition of the past and present, as well as the reflexive nature of it which we see through the interviews describing her life through other people.

Tuesday, 7 March 2017

Commissions | The Brief + Initial Thoughts (6th March 2017)


Today marked the start of our third and final practical unit of year 1: Commissions.  Where the previous two units have focused on fiction, for this unit, we will be producing factual documentaries and working in small groups rather than producing our own films.

In groups of 4, we are required to research, cast, script and edit a 10 minute documentary for a simulated documentary strand entitled 'Teen Spirit', which would (hypothetically) be released on BBC Three.  Our ideas should aim to 'inspire and empower' our audience from a 'teens-eye-view'.  Our films should also work as a standalone piece, being bold, brave and new.  We will be assessed on our preparatory work, individual input to the project within the group, our evidence, and of course: the final product.


I was happy that our choice for the subject matter was quite broad.  We can choose to focus on:


  • Health / Wellbeing
  • Family / Relationships
  • Science / Technology
  • Wildlife / Environment
  • Community / Social Affairs
  • Music / Arts / Culture
  • History
These topics can cover pretty much anything within the title 'Teen Spirit' and I had one idea in particular that came to mind straight away:
  • Teens with special needs: this would fall under the community/social affairs topic and my group could shoot a 'day in the life'-type documentary following a teenager with special needs.  This came to mind as my mum is a teacher at a special school and we would have a chance to see the world of someone that some people may not be familiar with or understand.
This would of course depend on whether I would be able to get permissions etc to record in this scenario, but this is just an initial idea and I will think about it more so I can present my ideas in the next session.

We also watched some of last year's work, which looked very professional and well-thought out.  These contained:
  • Establishing shots
  • GVs (General Views)
  • Narration / Commentary
  • Self-contained answers - the answers given did not rely on an explicitly asked question
  • Compressed time
These films gave me some inspiration for the sort of things we would need to shoot and set the tone for the quality of film we will be producing.

Later on, we had a screening of 'Britain Through A Lens: The Documentary Film Mob' which is a documentary, directed by Chris Durlacher, that focuses on the rise of the 'documentarist' movement in from 1929 to the Second World War.  It was interesting to see the history of the British documentary and provided an insight into the politics and reasoning behind why and how documentaries emerged as a genre in the 20th century.

Thursday, 2 March 2017

Directions | Project Evaluation

What worked?

Unlike the previous project, I am proud of the finished film.  I feel that I communicated my directorial vision very close to what I had in my head and the developments I made from the script translated well into the final edit.

I found the casting process went fairly well - whilst I did not hear back from any Casting Call Pro actors and resorted to asking my friend to fulfil the lead role, I feel that he acted well and suited the character very well.  I was also very happy with my casting choice for Shane as he was aesthetically just what I was looking for and he played the role with ease and delivered a solid performance.  Both actors were also very easy to work with and responded well to my directing, even when we had to take numerous takes for some scenes - they have both expressed an interest in working on my future projects as well, which I think reflects well on my directing.

I am happy with how I dealt with the shoot on the day with regards to my general attitude and directing ability despite the unfamiliar pressure of working with an actor I had never met and filming in different locations.  This allowed us to keep going and capture all the footage we needed through what became a 12 hour shoot.  In the previous project, the most prevalent issues came from how well the shoot was scheduled, so I ended up wasting a lot of time so I am glad I have rectified this for the Directions unit.

I am pleased with the overall edit, particularly the sound design and colour grading of the finished edit, and I feel my skills with Adobe Premiere and Audition are also blossoming.  I was quite disheartened looking at the initial footage for the second half of the shoot but once I had added the extra audio and graded it, I was pleased with how well it fit in with the rest of the film which was shot in an entirely different location.  Though it is a very minor aspect of the film, but even trivial aspects such as the font choice gave the film a professional and well-polished feel to the production.

If I was to be specific, I feel I am most pleased with the the transition from Rick's hallucination of Shane to the time-skip to post-apocalypse.  From the ticking clock to the flowers, I feel I approached this effectively from a directorial point of view to create a sense of mystery and to ensure the audience knew that a lot of time had passed since Shane delivered the flowers to Rick.

The practical effects and mis en scéne of the film added a lot to the atmosphere and authenticity of the production.  Though it is far from perfect, I was impressed with how we got the gore effects to look as good as they did on such a minuscule budget.  The medical training room was an almost perfect location and I feel it contributed to this realism and authenticity. 

What didn't work?

Whilst I am happy with the edit, there are certainly some parts of the sequence that could have done with more coverage.  This was largely due to the time constraints we had with the second location, which meant we rushed some scenes so we could finish on time.  This also affected the pacing of the film as it made some parts seem a little disjointed - the part where Rick leaves the hospital room and enters the corridor comes to mind, as there is no bridge between reaching for the handle and leaving the room.

The second location we used was not ideal and I had a lot of trouble trying to find somewhere to shoot the corridor and stairwell scenes.  After I contacted the Maidstone Studios and several schools and colleges in the area, I was losing hope as I thought I would not be able to shoot these scenes.  Had I not been working as boom operator for Sonia's shoot, I would not have found the location I did end up using and I am very grateful that she offered it as time was running out for me to shoot those scenes.  That being said, this did not come without limitations: we were now unable to shoot before 7 PM, and since my lead actor was not available on the Sunday evening, we had to shoot the entirety of the film in one day, which put a lot of pressure on the whole crew.

In order to save some time shooting in the second location, I opted not to record audio for some of the scenes.  In hindsight, this was probably not the best course of action as it meant I had to record more sounds after the shoot.  Even for simple things like footsteps and breathing, I recorded a large amount of the audio in the weeks after the shoot, and whilst working as a Foley artist is lots of fun, this ate into a lot of my time and became quite tedious matching the audio to the video during the edit.

What did I learn?

I worked with around almost ten actors from casting agencies - on other students' shoots as well as my own - and I found them to be incredibly down-to-earth and lovely to work with.  Of course this will not always be the case, but this project made me realise that I am not wasting their time to help me with a project, they are working alongside the crew because they chose to be there and they do what they are told.  This has made me more confident with working with people I do not know, as we both have a mutual interest to create engaging films and to expand our repertoire of experience in making films.

I learned that properly scheduling a shoot can benefit the entire creative process a great deal so that everybody knows exactly what should be going on and where they need to be throughout filming.

I also learned how important communication is both before and during the production process.  This is something that nearly every book and website on directing I have looked at advises and since I am not usually very good at communicating and organising on this level, this project forced me to do this so that everything could run smoothly.

What could I develop?

Though this is a fairly general comment relating to any work I do, but I feel I need to try not to get so stressed and worked up about the shoot.  Even though I had completed all the preparation I felt I needed, up until the day we shot my film, I had been getting very stressed about any potential issues that may arise to the point that I was losing a lot of sleep.  Therefore, I feel that simply taking a step back and clearing my mind may do a lot to help my general ability to work and allow me to feel more comfortable with dealing with unfamiliar working situations.

I think that I need to take more consideration in regards to the editing process whilst I am filming so that I capture all the video and audio I need to on the day rather than relying on recording more later on when I am already editing the film.

I feel I need to push myself even further next time I need actors as well.  Whilst I am very pleased with Aidan's performance in this film, he is a very good friend of mine, so I was very much within my comfort zone by working with him, so perhaps trying harder to reach out to actors so that I can get more experience with working with people I have not worked with before.

Directions | Director Statement

In this unit, we were tasked with choosing a scene from a director then shooting and editing it in our own directorial style.  The director I decided to focus on was Frank Darabont, famous for The Shawshank Redemption, The Green Mile, and for adapting The Walking Dead into a television format.  I picked a scene from The Walking Dead that I felt played an integral role in building the tone and atmosphere for the rest of the series, and one that also explores the reactions of the central character, Rick Grimes, as he awakens into a changed world.


I chose this scene in particular as I felt I would be able to depict a good balance of the relationship between Rick and Shane through their dialogue, and also the transition between civilisation and apocalypse through Rick's eyes.  The scene itself relies heavily on the visual aspects of the story rather than through dialogue, which is something I appreciate greatly in film and television.  I was particularly intrigued by how Darabont depicted the passing of time when Rick sees Shane in the hallucination to when he wakes up to find he has not been there for a long time.

This scene only required two actors (as well as some extras to play a corpse and some hands), and so I felt as though I should choose wisely as a lot of the drama would circulate from their performances.  My choice for Rick needed to look at least 25 year old and I needed someone who could deliver a good physical performance, as the majority of his time onscreen focuses on his journey through the hospital.  I feel that Aidan delivered a good performance as Rick; we saw the fear and confusion in his face when he sees the corpse and the undead hands clawing on the door.  My choice for Shane needed to show more subtlety in his physical performance as we only see him in the first scene.  I feel that Darrell was an almost perfect casting for Shane, not only due to his appearance, but also through his knowledge of the character and ability to depict him and his relationship to Rick.  Whilst there was very little 'performing' involved, I felt the corpse needed to be someone young and innocent-looking, and so I chose Sophie to fulfil this role to highlight that the innocent will not survive long in this new apocalyptic world.

It was vital that my locations seemed real so that I could create a fully immersive environment to add to the realism of the scene.  I was very fortunate to be able to film at the nursing agency as their training room looked very much like a hospital room: the size, lighting and geographical location was almost perfect.  This allowed me to portray an authentic looking hospital room so we are well aware that Rick is in a private hospital room and thus he is seriously injured before waking up.  This also meant that I had to consider other props that would properly enforce the hospital setting and the transition from pre to post-apocalypse.  I chose to include as many medical props as possible - a wheelchair, crutches, tissues, a nasal cannula, and the hospital bed each contributed to the hospital aesthetic, and adding the writing to the door, various debris and abandoned possessions (the handbag and phone) brought forth the idea of abandonment and the loss of hope after the apocalypse.

The Walking Dead is based in the United States but I wanted to adapt my scene into a British setting - this was largely because I wanted the dialogue to feel more natural, and so I chose not to force my actors to speak in a way that would be unnatural to them.  The costumes were also very important here and I took careful consideration to ensure that they contributed to the atmosphere of the scenes.  I was very specific with my costume choices: I dressed Shane in a white short sleeved shirt with a black tie and trousers, as British police officers wear under their jackets so it appeared as though he was off-duty; I also dressed Rick in an NHS hospital gown with a bandage around his torso, plain blue shorts and no shoes or socks.  Several people have pointed out that the hospital gown i in fact the wrong way around, but I chose to do this intentionally for two reasons; firstly, the original scene depicts Rick with his hospital gown this way around and I wanted to stay faithful to this aspect of the original; secondly, with the gown on this way, we see the bandage underneath so that the audience is more aware of why Rick is in hospital in the first place.

I felt that in order to do this scene justice, I had to ensure that I put a lot of effort towards the practical effects I used for the shoot.  I was inspired by Greg Nicotero put so much focus into this aspect of the film, as his special makeup effects add an entirely new dimension to the visuals of The Walking Dead.  Realistic-looking fake blood was vital, so I ended up using about half a litre all together and if we could, I would have chosen to use another half a litre.  I had to create the illusion that something had been eating this corpse and so I wanted to go all out with the gore elements to make the audience feel uneasy, as Rick would.  Makeup was also used to make Rick look more dishevelled, the hands clawing at the door to seem more animalistic and threatening and the corpse look realistic.  I also ensured I bought two of the same bunch of flowers several weeks apart, so it appeared as the same bunch of flowers - though the older bunch did not die as quickly as I had hoped, so I had to put them in the oven which worked just fine.


For a sequence such as this, the sound design had to immerse the viewer into the world so they can properly empathise with Rick in his difficult situation.  The first scene involves Rick in a sort of dream/hallucination before he wakes up to find that civilisation has ended, and I wanted to highlight this seemingly sudden transformation (from Rick's perspective).  I chose to open the scene with hints of what happened to Rick to land him in hospital by using short voice snippets from Shane such as "officer down" and "we need an ambulance".  I applied a FFT filter to this to make it sound muffled, as Rick would have been dazed and confused after he was shot - I added a high-pitched tone to add to this.  The hospital wild track was added with the ticking clock sound effect so that it could build up, getting louder and louder until the clock strikes for the last time and we move to the future where the clocks have stopped and people are dying.  Once the clock has struck, we are left with silence so I amplified the typically quiet sounds, such as the flowers crackling between Rick's fingers, his footsteps, and the constant hum of the fluorescent lighting.  I had not planned on using music to force any emotion in the scene, but the score I have used is subtle enough that it works alongside the visuals and other audio elements to build tension and fear.



I also wanted to emphasise the contrast between the dream sequence and the future reality through the camera.  My first choice here was to use a DSLR camera for the first sequence due to its superior depth of field abilities; I also increased the contrast and saturation on the camera itself to create the dreamlike look.  I was inspired by Marc Munden's surrealist use of contrast and saturation to create a divide between reality and sub-reality, but I wanted to avoid going overboard with the contrast and saturation as I feel Danny Boyle did in 28 Days Later.  After the time skip, I then switched to the Sony EX camera and tried to match the colours as closely as I could to the lighting on location so that it looked as lifelike as possible.  I opted for a POV shot from Rick's perspective looking at Shane and an extreme close up of his face to enforce the fact that this is in his head.  Once Rick wakes up, we transition to medium and wide shots, and as he begins to realise things are not as they seem, we switch to handheld to add to the sense of uneasiness.  I wanted to draw specific attention to particular details, such as the dead flowers by focusing on them in the initial POV shot and then cutting between medium and extreme close up shots so that we knew they became the most reliable indicator that a lot of time has passed since Rick was admitted into hospital.  As the sequence progresses, I relied more on handheld shots to mirror Rick being on the move, and as his fear begins to grow, the camera movements become more erratic and uncomfortable to parallel with his own mindset.

The overall mood I aimed for was initially that of Rick's fond memories of his friends and work, which later develops into confusion and then fear.  The sequence as a whole can therefore be split into three segments for the tone I wanted to convey:
  1. The dream sequene - the mood here was one of serenity and fondness, hence my choices to use bright and vibrant colouring, a busy soundscape, and calm camera movements.
  2. Rick wakes up - the mood then changes to reflect Rick's confusion as the colour scheme enters reality, the noises stop, and the camera movements begin to be more unsteady.
  3. Rick discovers the corpse - the final mood of the sequence now reflects the fear and panic Rick is feeling as the colours are darker, the lighting dimmer; then the music builds up and the camera movements become almost frantic.
I made these choices so that the audience could better empathise with Rick through the audiovisual content on screen, so they can immerse themselves into his journey from serenity to confused panic.  In the edit, I accentuated these through ensuring I paced the scenes to form a slow build up from each revelation Rick makes about what has happened.  I started by using crossfade transitions with the opening titles until the clock stops, then each movement and change in the narrative becomes a hard cut.  I changed the grading, so that the lighting in each scene matched for both continuity and to keep with the dark tones I wanted to convey.

To conclude, the choices I have made as a director have been enforced to allow for authenticity and empathy to emerge.  By building up the tension and fear of the scene using colour grading, sound design, pacing, lighting, and editing in general, I feel I have effectively conveyed the tone and mood I wanted to, combined with the practical effects and logistical planning which have created a realistic-feeling atmosphere for the scene.